ZEOLITE

EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW:

MUST SEE

🎬 (30m) How to Choose a Zeolite and Why

Have you heard of Colloidal Zeolite?

In this video:

- Comparing Different Products

- Acid, Water, Weight Tests

- Types of Zeolite

- Micronized vs Nano

- De-Alumination and why

- Activated vs Non Activated

Timeline:

00:00 - Getting to know and understand Zeolite

09:59 - Intro to the Products being compared

10:18 - Zeolite Basics: Types of Zeolite

11:19 - What does Zeolite Bind to?

12:32- Zeolite vs Charcoal

12:59 - The Sizes of Zeolite including Colloidal Zeolite

15:50 - Aluminum Dangers of Zeolite

16:35 - Activated Zeolite

18:02 - Zeolite and Metal

19:26 - Comparing the Zeolite Products Visual

21:57 - Water Test

25:08 - Acid Test

27:31 - Weight Test

29:37 - Conclusion

What kinds of zeolite are there that are available on the market?

They are either mined from natural deposits or produced synthetically, each offering distinct pore sizes and ion-exchange capabilities for different applications. While there are hundreds of distinct zeolites recognized by structural code, the ones most commonly cited are the natural varieties such as clinoptilolite, mordenite, chabazite, and faujasite, and the synthetic industrial workhorses like zeolite A (LTA), X/Y (FAU), ZSM-5 (MFI), and Beta (BEA).

Major Natural Zeolites:

Clinoptilolite (framework code: HEU [closely related to heulandite])

Mordenite (MOR)

Chabazite (CHA)

Erionite (ERI)

Faujasite (FAU; natural analog of zeolite X/Y)

Phillipsite (PHI)

Heulandite (HEU; same code family as clinoptilolite but distinct species)

Laumontite (LAU)

Analcime (ANA)

Natrolite (NAT)

Mesolite (NES)

Scolecite (SCO)

Thomsonite (THO)

Stilbite (STI)

Pollucite (ANA family; sometimes designated POL in older texts)

Offretite (OFF) – found both naturally and as a synthetic analog.

Some of these natural frameworks (e.g., HEU or MOR) are also synthesized for specific industrial uses.

Well-Known Synthetic Zeolites":

Zeolite A (LTA)

– Common commercial forms: 3A, 4A, 5A (numbers refer to pore sizes in Ångstroms).

Zeolite X (FAU)

– Similar to natural faujasite but with a different Si/Al ratio.

Zeolite Y (FAU)

– Another synthetic faujasite variant, widely used in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) in petroleum refining.

Zeolite ZSM-5 (MFI)

– Widely used in petrochemical catalytic processes (e.g., isomerization, alkylation).

Zeolite Beta (BEA)

– Large pore zeolite used in catalytic applications.

Zeolite L (LTL)

– Used in certain specialty refining and separation processes.

Ferrierite (FER)

– Exists in both natural and synthetic forms; used for selective sorption and catalysis.

Mordenite (MOR) [Synthetic form]

– Although naturally occurring, mordenite can be synthesized with controlled properties.

USY (Ultrastable Y, FAU)

– A stabilized version of zeolite Y with partially dealuminated frameworks.

SAPO-34 (CHA structure, Silicoaluminophosphate)

– A member of the zeotype family (SAPO), used in methanol-to-olefins reactions.

TS-1 (Titanium Silicalite-1, MFI)

– A titanosilicate used for selective oxidation reactions (e.g., epoxidations).

ZSM-11 (MEL)

– Structurally related to ZSM-5 but with a slightly different channel system.

Zeolite RHO (RHO)

– Known for gas separations, particularly CO₂.

Offretite (OFF) [Synthetic variant]

– Prepared in the lab for certain catalytic and sorption uses.

…and many more exist, each tailored or discovered for specific property enhancements (pore size, acidity, hydrothermal stability, etc.).

IZA Framework Codes: Over 250 Recognized Types:

Zeolite structures are cataloged by the Structure Commission of the International Zeolite Association (IZA). Each unique three-dimensional framework is assigned a three-letter code (e.g., LTA, FAU, MFI, MOR). As of 2023, there are more than 250 such framework types.

Some examples include:

• ANA – Analcime family

• BEA – Beta

• CHA – Chabazite

• FAU – Faujasite

• FER – Ferrierite

• HEU – Heulandite/Clinoptilolite family

• IFR – IM-5 (synthetic)

• ITQ, UTD, COK families – modern synthetic materials named after the labs that developed them

• LTA – Zeolite A

• LTL – Zeolite L

• MEL – ZSM-11

• MFI – ZSM-5 (silicalite family)

• MOR – Mordenite

• OFF – Offretite

• RHO – Zeolite RHO

• UTL – IPC-2, -4 derivatives (newer layered zeolites)

• SOD – Sodalite

References & Further Reading:

• International Zeolite Association, Structure Database: http://www.iza-structure.org/databases/

• Baerlocher, C., Meier, W. M., & Olson, D. H. (2007). Atlas of Zeolite Framework Types (6th ed.). Elsevier.

• Auerbach, S. M., Carrado, K. A., & Dutta, P. K. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of Zeolite Science and Technology. CRC Press.

• Weitkamp, J., & Puppe, L. (Eds.). (1999). Catalysis and Zeolites: Fundamentals and Applications. Springer.

What does zeolite bind to when it comes to compounds in the body, like heavy metals and ammonia?

Below is an extensively researched (though practically never 100% exhaustive) list of ions, metals, and molecular species that zeolites have been reported to bind or exchange. The exact binding capacity varies depending on the type of zeolite (e.g., clinoptilolite, mordenite, faujasite, zeolite A, ZSM-5), the pH of the environment, and other conditions. Different zeolites have different pore sizes, Si/Al ratios, and framework structures, all of which affect their affinity for specific ions or molecules. Nonetheless, this list reflects commonly documented species from peer-reviewed literature and standard references (e.g., Kulprathipanja, 2010; Weitkamp & Puppe, 1999; Auerbach et al., 2003).

Alkaline (Group 1) Metal Cations:

• Lithium (Li⁺)

• Sodium (Na⁺)

• Potassium (K⁺)

• Rubidium (Rb⁺)

• Cesium (Cs⁺)

Most zeolites naturally contain and readily exchange Na⁺ or K⁺, but they can also accommodate Li⁺, Rb⁺, and Cs⁺, particularly in ion-exchange applications for nuclear waste or industrial effluents.

Alkaline Earth (Group 2) Metal Cations:

• Magnesium (Mg²⁺)

• Calcium (Ca²⁺)

• Strontium (Sr²⁺)

• Barium (Ba²⁺)

Many natural zeolites (e.g., clinoptilolite) show high affinity for strontium (Sr²⁺) and barium (Ba²⁺), which makes them useful for remediation of radioactive 90Sr, and for softening water (removing Ca²⁺/Mg²⁺).

Transition & Post-Transition Metal Cations:

• Iron (Fe²⁺ and Fe³⁺)

• Copper (Cu⁺ and Cu²⁺)

• Zinc (Zn²⁺)

• Nickel (Ni²⁺)

• Cobalt (Co²⁺)

• Manganese (Mn²⁺)

• Chromium (Cr³⁺)

• Lead (Pb²⁺)

• Cadmium (Cd²⁺)

• Mercury (Hg²⁺)

• Silver (Ag⁺)

• Gold (Au³⁺) – less common but documented in certain ion-exchange studies

• Tin (Sn²⁺ or Sn⁴⁺) – less commonly reported

• Thallium (Tl⁺) – in some specialized research settings

Many of these transition and post-transition metal ions bind to zeolites via ion exchange or complexation in the zeolite framework. This property is exploited in water treatment processes for removing toxic and heavy metals (e.g., Pb²⁺, Cd²⁺, and Hg²⁺).

Ammonium & Other Polyatomic Cations:

• Ammonium (NH₄⁺) – widely recognized removal of ammonia/ammonium from wastewater

• Protonated amines (R–NH₃⁺) – in certain applications, organic cations can be exchanged into zeolite frameworks

Rare Earth & Lanthanide Series Cations:

• Lanthanum (La³⁺)

• Cerium (Ce³⁺ or Ce⁴⁺)

• Europium (Eu³⁺)

• Neodymium (Nd³⁺)

• Gadolinium (Gd³⁺)

• Samarium (Sm³⁺)

• Dysprosium (Dy³⁺)

Molecular & Neutral Species Adsorbed by Zeolites Although the question focuses on ions/metals, zeolites are also famous for adsorbing neutral molecules and gases due to their microporous structure. Notably:

• Water (H₂O) – zeolites are excellent desiccants

• Ammonia (NH₃)

• Hydrogen Sulfide (H₂S)

• Sulfur Dioxide (SO₂)

• Carbon Dioxide (CO₂)

• Nitrogen (N₂) and Oxygen (O₂) – relevant in gas separations

• Light Hydrocarbons (methane, ethane, propane, etc.)

• Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) – e.g., benzene, toluene, xylene (especially in hydrophobic high-silica zeolites)

Additional Notes and Caveats:

• Actual binding capacity or “affinity” depends on: – Zeolite structure (pore size, crystallographic channels)

– Si:Al ratio (affects cation exchange capacity)

– Presence of competing ions

– pH and temperature

– Pre-treatment or modification (e.g., acid-activated, metal-exchanged)

• While many metals and ions appear on this list, a single type of zeolite may not bind them all equally well; selectivity differs among zeolite varieties (clinoptilolite versus mordenite, etc.).

• Some of the more exotic or higher-valent ions require specialized conditions to be adsorbed or exchanged effectively.

References for Further Reading:

• Kulprathipanja, S. (Ed.). (2010). Zeolites in Industrial Separation and Catalysis. Wiley-VCH.

• Weitkamp, J., & Puppe, L. (Eds.). (1999). Catalysis and Zeolites: Fundamentals and Applications. Springer.

• Auerbach, S. M., Carrado, K. A., & Dutta, P. K. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of Zeolite Science and Technology. CRC Press.

• Ming, D. W., & Mumpton, F. A. (Eds.). (1989). Natural Zeolites '89: Occurrence, Properties, Use. Pergamon.

Compared to Charcoal, what does zeolite remove by binding?

Clinoptilolite zeolite excels at trapping cationic heavy metals, ammonia, and certain radioactive ions.

Charcoal is more effective at adsorbing a wide range of organic toxins, gases, and some heavy metals.

Sizes of zeolite that are available on the market:

Commercial zeolite products (both natural and synthetic) come in a wide range of particle sizes—from nano-scale powders to multi-millimeter pellets or granules—depending on the intended application (e.g., water filtration, catalysis, animal feed supplement). Unlike a single standardized size chart, manufacturers typically classify zeolite according to either mesh size, microns (μm), or pellet diameter (inches/mm). Below is a general overview of common commercial size ranges you might encounter on the market, starting with the smallest powders and moving up to large particles:

Nano & Sub-Micron Powders

• Nominal particle diameter: <1 μm (micrometers) (down to ∼200–500 nm in specialized products)

• Produced primarily for specialized applications (e.g., high-performance catalysts, advanced research, coatings)

• Often labeled “nanozeolite” or “colloidal zeolite”

Micronized Powders

• Typical particle diameter: 1–10 μm (micrometers) range

• Commonly used in:

– Animal feed additives

– Soil amendments

– Some filtration or adsorption processes needing high surface area

• Often advertised as “micronized clinoptilolite” or “micronized zeolite powder”

Note: ZeoGuard Size: 2μm (micrometers)

Fine Powder / Flour Grades

• Typical mesh sizes: 200–325 mesh (∼74–44 μm)

• Sometimes reported as <45 μm D50 (meaning half the particles are below 45 μm)

• Used in: – Industrial filler and binder applications

– Some water treatment pre-mix solutions

– Paint and polymer additives

Granular or Crystalline “Sand” Grades

• Wide range of mesh sizes: from about 80 mesh (∼177 μm) up to coarse 14 mesh (∼1.4 mm)

• Common designations for water filtration media, aquarium substrates, or horticultural soils:

14×40 mesh (approx. 1.4 mm to 0.425 mm)

14×50 mesh (approx. 1.4 mm to 0.297 mm)

40×80 mesh (approx. 0.425 mm to 0.177 mm)

• Used in: – Municipal/industrial water filtration

– Odor-control filters (air/gas)

– Soil and turf applications

Coarse Grains / Chips / Pellets:

• Typical particle diameter: 2–5 mm, depending on screening or shaping process

• Sometimes labeled “chips” or “coarse granules” for water or gas filtration columns

• Used in: – Large-scale filtration systems (e.g., pool or industrial filters)

– Ion exchange columns

– Catalyst supports (in some cases)

Extrudates / Pellets (Formed Shapes):

• Common pellet diameters: 1/32", 1/16", 1/8" (approx. 0.8 mm, 1.6 mm, 3.2 mm)

• Commonly used in: – Industrial catalytic reactors (petroleum refining, petrochemical processes)

– Gas adsorption (pressure swing adsorption units)

– Packed-bed columns for specialized chemical processes

Large Lumps / Rocks:

• Sizes from 1–2 cm up to several centimeters, typically sold as “raw ore” or “crushed rock”

• Natural clinoptilolite or mordenite deposits sometimes mined and shipped in bulk for: – On-site grinding or processing

– Roadbed stabilization

– Agriculture/horticulture to be further crushed on demand

Important Notes and Caveats:

• Mesh vs. Micron:

Many suppliers list products by mesh (a sieve standard) while others specify average particle diameter in micrometers (μm).

• Variation by Manufacturer:

Each manufacturer may have proprietary size cuts or blends (for instance “8×16 mesh,” “14×50 mesh,” “30×50 mesh,” etc.).

• Application-Driven:

Selection of zeolite size depends on filtration velocity, required contact time, pressure drop considerations, desired surface area, etc.

• Agglomerates vs.

True Particle Size: Powdered zeolites can form agglomerates, so “effective” particle size in a real process may differ from the nominal primary particle size.

Activated zeolite (dealuminated)

Zeolite and Aluminum (Aluminosilicate Framework):

• Zeolites themselves are naturally aluminosilicate minerals: their frameworks are composed of SiO₄ and AlO₄ tetrahedra.

• Because of this natural aluminum content, measuring total aluminum in a water sample after contact with zeolite can sometimes be complicated; in some conditions, small amounts of aluminum might leach from the zeolite itself.

Using organic acids metal ions are removed from the zeolite. This process is done to dissolve aluminum (dealumination) and other cations from the zeolite framework and exchange sites. It can also remove impurities and widen or unclog pores, making these spaces available for toxins and other compounds. Removing non-framework cations and some dealumination can unclog pores, increase surface area, and create new pore structures or secondary mesopores, all of which can boost accessibility to exchange sites and even increase zeolites ability to remove aluminum by binding to it.

Why only use a non-metal spoon?

Using a non-metal spoon when handling zeolite is often recommended for two main reasons—preventing unintended metal uptake and preserving product purity. While short contact with stainless steel in neutral conditions typically causes negligible effects, the general advice is meant to avoid the following:

Potential Metal Exchange or Leaching:

• Zeolites are known for exchanging or adsorbing metal ions. If the spoon metal can be released into the mixture (especially under acidic or otherwise reactive conditions), those ions may bind to the zeolite.

• This may partially “use up” the zeolite’s ion-exchange capacity before it can bind the metals or contaminants you want to remove.

Minimizing Contamination:

• Any metal ions leached from the spoon can end up in the final product or solution, which may be undesirable in applications where purity is important (e.g., supplements, sensitive laboratory work).

• Non-metal utensils (like plastic or ceramic) minimize the chance of inadvertently introducing additional metals or affecting the zeolite’s composition.

Can Zeolite bind to and remove fenbendazole?

Fenbendazole is a benzimidazole-class antiparasitic drug with moderate lipophilicity (fat solubility) and a primarily neutral molecular structure under physiologic pH conditions. The likelihood of a substance binding to a particular adsorbent (such as zeolite or activated charcoal) depends on numerous factors, including pore size, molecular size, polarity, and the adsorbent’s overall chemical properties.

Below is an overview of why zeolite would be less likely to bind fenbendazole while activated charcoal would more readily adsorb it:

Differences in Adsorbent Mechanisms:

Zeolites: Zeolites are crystalline aluminosilicates with well-defined micropores of relatively fixed size. They primarily function through ion-exchange processes and size-selective “molecular sieving,” meaning they excel at binding smaller ions (especially cations) and polar molecules that fit into their pore network.

Activated Charcoal: Also known as activated carbon, charcoal is highly porous with a large surface area. Its pores are irregularly sized but generally can physically accommodate a wide range of organic molecules. It attracts and holds many organic compounds through hydrophobic interactions (often referred to as van der Waals forces) and π-π stacking if aromatic rings are involved.

Chemical Nature of Fenbendazole:

Neutral Molecule: Under normal physiological or ambient conditions, fenbendazole is not significantly ionized. Zeolites, being strongly oriented toward cation exchange (e.g., binding positively charged metal ions), have a lower affinity for neutral, relatively non-polar compounds.

Moderate Lipophilicity: Fenbendazole’s moderate lipophilicity means it dissolves better into or adsorbs onto materials that can accommodate hydrophobic interactions—like activated charcoal’s extensive carbon matrix—rather than zeolite’s ion-exchange sites.

Molecular Size and Zeolite Pore Structure:

Pore Size Constraints: Zeolites’ pore or channel sizes can be small relative to fenbendazole’s molecular structure, possibly preventing significant penetration into the internal cavities of the zeolite. Even if the molecule fits, the neutral nature of fenbendazole offers fewer points for strong electrostatic or ion-exchange bonding inside these channels.

Activated Charcoal Porosity: Activated charcoal has a wide distribution of pore sizes, thus allowing larger organic molecules (like many pharmaceuticals, including fenbendazole) to be physically trapped and bound to its surfaces.

Supporting Peer-Reviewed and Veterinary Perspectives:

• Fenbendazole pharmacology and solubility are often cited in veterinary parasitology and pharmacology textbooks (e.g., see “Veterinary Pharmacology: A Practical Guide for the Veterinary Nurse,” and “Handbook of Equine Parasite Control” by Nielsen & Reinemeyer). These sources highlight fenbendazole’s relatively lipophilic nature and its common formulations in suspension or paste, making it more receptive to adsorption by carbon-based adsorbents than by zeolites.

• Zeolites are discussed widely in research for their ion-exchange properties and pollutant removal in water treatment (e.g., see reviews such as “Zeolites in Water and Wastewater Treatment,” published in Materials).

These sources point out zeolites tend to be most effective at binding cations and smaller polar molecules rather than larger, neutral, hydrophobic substances.

In summary, fenbendazole’s lipophilic and primarily neutral structure means it is more likely to be adsorbed by activated charcoal, which utilizes broad-spectrum hydrophobic and physical adsorption, than by zeolite, whose pore structure and ion-exchange mechanism favor smaller, positively charged or polar compounds.

However, if someone were to consume both, they should still space the consumption of zeolite and fenbendazole 2-3 hours from each other.

Storage:

• Keep the container tightly sealed: Zeolite is highly absorptive and can degrade in efficacy if exposed to moisture or contaminants.

• Place in a cool, dry cupboard: Ideal temperature is typically between 15–25°C (59–77°F).

• Avoid humidity: In damp environments, charcoal can adsorb water from the air, decreasing its effectiveness.

• Avoid direct sunlight: UV exposure and heat can reduce overall shelf life.

Using as a Binder with Fenbendazole:

According to veterinary pharmacology references (Plumb’s Veterinary Drug Handbook and other peer-reviewed veterinarian literature), while fenbendazole is generally safe, rapid parasite kill-off can lead to adverse inflammatory responses in some animals, particularly if the parasite burden is large. Most binders should be taken separately (2-3 hours after) from the medication and food to mitigate potential absorption of the medication.

Human medical literature has documented Herxheimer reactions primarily with bacterial die-off (e.g., syphilis, Lyme disease). However, similar mechanisms can apply when large numbers of parasites are killed, releasing antigenic material.

Holistic or integrative practices sometimes suggest “binders” (e.g., activated charcoal, bentonite clay, zeolite) to help reduce ongoing toxin recirculation in the gut. If no measures are taken to bind or eliminate these toxins (e.g., using recommended supportive therapies, ensuring optimal hydration, using veterinarian-approved supplements), the body may experience heightened inflammatory states, gastrointestinal distress, neurological symptoms, or organ stress.

Potential Toxins or Pathogens Released:

When parasites or other organisms (e.g., endosymbiotic bacteria living within worms) are killed rapidly, the following may be released:

Endotoxins (Lipopolysaccharides, LPS):

Though most commonly associated with Gram-negative bacteria, parasitic infections can harbor bacterial symbionts. When these bacteria die, they can release LPS.

LPS is known to provoke inflammatory responses and can contribute to systemic “die-off” or inflammation.


Parasite Antigens (Excretory-Secretory Products):

Worms produce various proteins, peptides, and other antigens during their life cycles. Upon the parasites’ death, a sudden surge of these components can elicit a strong immune response.

These proteins may cause local inflammation, itching, or other immune-mediated effects.

Metabolic Byproducts of Parasite Destruction:

Proteolytic enzymes, cellular debris, or other breakdown products generated when the parasite’s tissues decompose.

Such byproducts can irritate the gastrointestinal lining and potentially impact liver and kidney function if not quickly metabolized and excreted.

Secondary Pathogens:

In some parasitic infections (e.g., filarial worms like Dirofilaria immitis in dogs), symbiotic bacteria (such as Wolbachia) are common. Killing the worms leads to bacterial release, which can further trigger inflammatory responses.

Occasionally, parasites may harbor or disrupt resident microbiota in the host’s gut. The shift in microbiome balance when parasites are killed could stir up additional toxins or alter bacterial populations.

Possible Effects on the Body if No Binders Are Used:

If these toxins or die-off products are not managed (for example, by using binders, ensuring adequate hydration, or other supportive measures), they may accumulate or spread throughout the body more freely. Potential effects include:

Inflammatory Responses:

Systemic inflammation can manifest as fever, chills, muscle aches, or fatigue (similar to a Herxheimer reaction).

Cytokine surges (in response to endotoxins or antigens) can exacerbate joint pain and cause generalized malaise.

Potential Symptom Mitigation with Activated Carbon:

Lowered Endotoxin Levels:

Endotoxins (e.g., lipopolysaccharides from bacteria) can fuel inflammation. Activated carbon may bind some of these molecules in the gut before they enter circulation, theoretically reducing overall inflammatory load (Ref 1, 3).

Decreased Cytokine Surge:

Less endotoxin absorption could reduce local and systemic cytokine release, mitigating symptoms like fever, chills, and joint/muscle pain (Ref 2).


Gastrointestinal Distress:

Increased gastrointestinal upset, diarrhea, or cramping as the gut lining becomes irritated by parasite debris and associated toxins.

Nausea and possible vomiting if the toxin load is high.

Potential Symptom Mitigation with Activated Carbon:

Adsorption of Irritants:

Activated carbon binds potential irritants in the GI tract, which may ease diarrhea, cramping, and nausea (Ref 5, 6).

Less Toxin-Related GI Irritation:

– With reduced exposure to toxic by-products, the gut lining experiences less irritation overall, potentially stabilizing bowel motility (Ref 5).

Neurological Symptoms:

Headaches, brain fog, or dizziness.

These symptoms can be related to inflammatory cytokines and toxin accumulation affecting the central nervous system.

Potential Symptom Mitigation with Activated Carbon:

Indirect Neurological Benefit:

Many neurological symptoms (e.g., headaches, brain fog, dizziness) associated with die-off may be driven by inflammatory mediators and toxins. By binding toxins and reducing systemic circulation, activated carbon use may lessen these symptoms (Ref 3, 7).

Blood-Brain Barrier Considerations:

While activated charcoal acts primarily within the gut, decreased systemic toxin loads can translate to fewer inflammatory signals crossing the blood-brain barrier (Ref 7).

Immune System Over-Stimulation:

Rashes, hives, or other allergic-type responses.

Eosinophilia (an increase in eosinophil count) can happen in parasitic infections themselves and may spike if the immune system is reacting to large amounts of antigenic debris.

Potential Symptom Mitigation with Activated Carbon:

Reduced Allergic-Type Responses:

If fewer toxins and antigens enter the bloodstream, the immune system may be less likely to mount a robust hyper-reactive response (e.g., rashes, hives) (Ref 3, 7).

Overall Immune Balance:

By controlling the source of toxins in the gut, there is potential for a more balanced immune function, lowering the likelihood of cytokine surges and histamine-mediated responses (Ref 1, 7).


Potential Organ Stress:

The liver and kidneys, responsible for detoxification, may become stressed if there is a rapid influx of toxins.

In rare, severe cases, systemic toxicity could lead to hypotension or other more serious complications.


References (Illustrative Examples)


Trewin, H., et al. Activated carbon for the control of toxin release in water systems. Water Research (2016) 91:225–233.

  1. Juang, R. S., et al. Adsorption behavior of several dyes onto activated carbon. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science (2002) 254(2):234–241.

  2. Yang, H., et al. Adsorption of bacterial endotoxin with porous carbon materials. Langmuir (2015) 31(10):3098–3107.

  3. The Merck Veterinary Manual. Activated Charcoal. (Available online)

  4. Contreras, R.G. et al. Activated charcoal as a nonspecific adsorbent in gastrointestinal detoxification: a review. Toxicon (2020) 181:1–9.

  5. McPherson, T., & Pike, R. Activated charcoal usage in outpatient settings. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (2018) 75(12):881–889.

  6. Lin, Y. L., & Cheng, T. J. Effects of activated charcoal on inflammatory response. Bioscience Reports (2017) 37(4): BSR20170087.